Jump to content


Photo

Processing methods


  • Please log in to reply
3 replies to this topic

#1 Dimitrios Koukas

Dimitrios Koukas
  • Sustaining Members
  • 569 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Athens, Greece, London UK

Posted 29 September 2005 - 08:44 AM

Let's say we have a 35mm original, cut to cut and with some dissolves like 10 and some fades let's say 5 fade outs.
What u would suggest, go for A-B roll, or just give the effects only for optical printing Internegative -interpositive and then ''patch'' them, (add them)in the cut to cut single roll?
Would be this the best for the films quality, or the I/N -I/P would be ''jump out'' to someones eye?

Dimitrios Koukas
  • 0

#2 Stephen Williams

Stephen Williams
  • Sustaining Members
  • 4708 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Europe

Posted 29 September 2005 - 09:04 AM

Let's say we have a 35mm original, cut to cut and with some dissolves like 10 and some fades let's say 5 fade outs.
What u would suggest, go for A-B roll, or just give the effects only for optical printing Internegative -interpositive and then ''patch'' them, (add them)in the cut to cut single roll?
Would be this the best for the films quality, or the I/N -I/P would be ''jump out'' to someones eye?

Dimitrios Koukas

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>


Hi,

I would go A-B roll!

Stephen
  • 0

#3 John Pytlak RIP

John Pytlak RIP

    (deceased)

  • Sustaining Members
  • 3499 posts
  • Industry Rep
  • Rochester, NY 14650-1922

Posted 29 September 2005 - 09:30 AM

Let's say we have a 35mm original, cut to cut and with some dissolves like 10 and some fades let's say 5 fade outs.
What u would suggest, go for A-B roll, or just give the effects only for optical printing Internegative -interpositive and then ''patch'' them, (add them)in the cut to cut single roll?
Would be this the best for the films quality, or the I/N -I/P would be ''jump out'' to someones eye?

Dimitrios Koukas

<{POST_SNAPBACK}>


For simple fades and dissolves, cutting A/B rolls usually offers the best image quality, although there may be a slight difference in the ramp of the fade between one being done on a continuous contact printer on A/B rolls, and one done on an optical printer:

http://www.acvl.org/handbook/3c.htm

Modern intermediate films like Kodak VISION Color Intermediate Film 5242 produce duplicate negatives that intercut very well with the original negative --- cut-ins no longer "jump out" with a "dupey look" and grain increase as they did in films made a few decades ago in the days of 5253.
  • 0

#4 Dominic Case

Dominic Case
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1357 posts
  • Other
  • Sydney Australia

Posted 29 September 2005 - 07:46 PM

Optical fades and dissolves would not stand out provided the duplication was done properly.

A&B rolls are a natural way to do this in 16mm, as you have A&B rolls anyway, for the checkerboard cutting. For 35mm, it might depend on how many fades & dissolves you want, how many prints you intend to make from the original negative, and whether the lab charges extrs for the B-rolls.

Also remember that optical, or digital, fades & dissolves can be any length, whereas the A&B roll method is restricted to 16,24,32,48, 64 or 96 frames in length, and there has to be a specific "recovery time" between the end of one transition and the beginning of the next.
  • 0


rebotnix Technologies

Technodolly

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Rig Wheels Passport

Glidecam

Metropolis Post

CineLab

Opal

Tai Audio

Abel Cine

Aerial Filmworks

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Visual Products

Wooden Camera

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

Paralinx LLC

Ritter Battery

Willys Widgets

The Slider

FJS International, LLC

CineTape

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Metropolis Post

rebotnix Technologies

FJS International, LLC

Wooden Camera

CineLab

The Slider

Opal

Willys Widgets

CineTape

Visual Products

Aerial Filmworks

Ritter Battery

Rig Wheels Passport

Abel Cine

Glidecam

Technodolly

Paralinx LLC

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

Tai Audio

Broadcast Solutions Inc