Jump to content


Photo

Best process to fihish in 35mm


  • Please log in to reply
3 replies to this topic

#1 Ernesto Martínez Bucio

Ernesto Martínez Bucio

    New

  • Basic Members
  • Pip
  • 8 posts
  • Student
  • Guadalajara, México

Posted 11 October 2005 - 03:41 PM

1. RANK one light
2. Editing in MiniDV
3. Cut the negative
4. 2nd. RANK with color correction with transfer to HDTV
5. DATA TO FILM (HDTV to 35mm)

is that correct?
is the best process and the less expensive?

thanks

Ernesto Martínez Bucio
  • 0

#2 Dominic Case

Dominic Case
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPipPip
  • 1357 posts
  • Other
  • Sydney Australia

Posted 11 October 2005 - 05:54 PM

Do you want the least expensive or the best process? Usually you have to choose.

Going via HDTV certainly isn't the best. You should go via a DI - with proper 2K scanning. I'massuming you are starting with 16mm negative - you don't mention that rather important factor.

And you shouldn't need to cut the negative (in the sense of a fine cut). Better to pull full takes for the second transfer, it avoids splices.
  • 0

#3 Dimitrios Koukas

Dimitrios Koukas
  • Sustaining Members
  • 569 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Athens, Greece, London UK

Posted 12 October 2005 - 02:24 AM

1. RANK one light
2. Editing in MiniDV
3. Cut the negative
4. 2nd. RANK with color correction with transfer to HDTV
5. DATA TO FILM (HDTV to 35mm)

is that correct?
is the best process and the less expensive?

thanks

Ernesto Martínez Bucio


Do u have special effects in the film?
If you just have cuts and fades then u should just rank one light with keycode on a dv or whatever media is suitable for your editing suite, cut the negative based on the keycode and then do the colour timing on a film lab and go for blow-up to 35mm release print .(If you negative is 16mm or S16mm)
This would have the less quality loss possible.
Dimitrios Koukas
  • 0

#4 Joseph White

Joseph White
  • Basic Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 143 posts
  • Cinematographer
  • Los Angeles, CA

Posted 12 October 2005 - 02:37 AM

yeah a lot of this has to do with the specific look of the film. there are a lot of films shot on 16mm that, through a DI and shooting with longer lenses and slower stocks, can look fantastic as 35mm prints. some films look great with the optical blowup process as the optical step provides a look thats appropriate for the film. there isn't much of a point to do a non-photochemical finish (telecine to HD off of cut negative for a film-out) in terms of color if you aren't doing a DI or tons of effects. if you are going to just telecine in this manner i'd also say you shouldn't cut your negative.
  • 0


Rig Wheels Passport

Technodolly

Glidecam

Opal

Paralinx LLC

Tai Audio

FJS International, LLC

rebotnix Technologies

Ritter Battery

Abel Cine

Metropolis Post

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

The Slider

Wooden Camera

CineLab

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Aerial Filmworks

CineTape

Visual Products

Willys Widgets

Glidecam

Ritter Battery

The Slider

Visual Products

Aerial Filmworks

Broadcast Solutions Inc

Gamma Ray Digital Inc

Willys Widgets

Abel Cine

Tai Audio

Paralinx LLC

Media Blackout - Custom Cables and AKS

FJS International, LLC

Rig Wheels Passport

CineLab

CineTape

rebotnix Technologies

Metropolis Post

Opal

Wooden Camera

Technodolly